Casalee mines for Saddam Hussein
Goods category: War materiel
Public Domain (US-Regierungswerk; PD-USGov-CIA)
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add Iraq to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Iraq could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. The United States could serve as a third country, having, according to SIPRI, supplied substantial quantities of war materiel to Iraq in recent years (3’948 million TIV).
Countries
Conflicts
Companies
Time period
Deliveries in 1982–1986; court reports in 1991/1993
Sources
- Blick, 31.01.1990
- Cash, 10.12.1993, S. 33: Anton Ladner, «Verdacht nicht abwegig» (eingereichter Archivtext)
- SonntagsBlick, 05.12.1993, S. 4: «Banken-Ombudsmann verlor Prozess» (eingereichter Archivtext)
- Beobachter, 12.05.1995: Werner Catrina, «Perfide Killer, als Spielzeug getarnt» (eingereichter Archivtext)
- Das Magazin, 03.05.1997, S. 14: Christoph Keller, «Doppeltes Gesicht» (eingereichter Archivtext)