Ems fuze-system licence for the apartheid regime
Goods category: War materiel
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add South Africa to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for South Africa could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. The Netherlands could serve as a third country, having, according to SIPRI, supplied substantial quantities of war materiel to South Africa in recent years (90 million TIV).
Countries
Conflicts
Companies
Time period
Licence concluded in spring 1984; cooperation until at least 1991
Sources
- Facts, 25.01.1996, S. 16 ff.: Blochers Geschäfte mit den Kriegsherren der Welt (Res Gehriger), einschliesslich der Stellungnahme des Ems-Konzerns
- Interdepartementale Arbeitsgruppe Schweiz–Südafrika, Juli 1999: Die Beziehungen zwischen der Schweiz und Südafrika, S. 14, 22–23 und Anhang 5, Ziff. 3.8/4, S. 67
- Martin Stoll, Facts Nr. 28/2002: Von oben gebilligt, S. 21–25, insbesondere S. 24–25; Mitarbeit Stefan Barmettler
- Tages-Anzeiger, 13.11.2002, S. 2: Ed Fagan verklagt drei weitere Schweizer Firmen (Martina Egli)
- Facts, 25.01.1996, S. 16–24: Ems-Patvag — Blochers Geschäfte mit den Kriegsherren der Welt (Res Gehriger)