Artillery parts for Khamenei’s Iran
Goods category: War materiel
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add Iran, Thailand and Pakistan to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Iran, Thailand and Pakistan could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. For example, the following states could serve as third countries, having supplied substantial quantities of war materiel in recent years according to SIPRI: Thailand: United States (476 million TIV); Pakistan: United States (2’134 million TIV).
Countries
Companies
Time period
Rights acquired in 1993/1994; Thailand delivery before 1997; Iran in 1997; Pakistan talks in 1998; investigations reported until 2000
Sources
- Österreichisches Parlament, Anfrage 5285/J, XX. GP: Kanonenteile für den Iran (parlamentarische Anfrage, kein Urteil)
- Facts, 21.12.2000, S. 20: Bührles tödliche Fracht (Daniel Ammann)
- Facts, 23.07.1998, S. 54: Waffen für die Mullahs (Daniel Ammann)
- Aargauer Zeitung, 19.12.2000, S. 23: Illegaler Waffenexport nach Iran? (Arthur Meyer)