Swiss War Materiel and Arms Exports

Back to the list

Mortars for Oman via Erdoğan’s Turkey

Goods category: War materiel

A Swiss company supplied mortars to Turkey, where they were installed in armoured vehicles and then exported to Oman. SECO required the Swiss supplier to be present during installation and agreed on inspection arrangements in Turkey. Oman confirmed receipt and its role as end user and accepted inspections. In September 2020, SECO section head Simon Plüss described the transaction as an example of controlled deliveries through a third country. In 2024, possible technical defects in a RUAG mortar project for Oman and resulting warranty risks became known.

Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision

Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add Turkey and Oman to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Turkey and Oman could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. For example, the following states could serve as third countries, having supplied substantial quantities of war materiel in recent years according to SIPRI: Turkey: United States (3’964 million TIV); Oman: United Kingdom (1’222 million TIV).

Countries

Companies

Time period

Delivery by 2020 at the latest; SECO confirmation in 2020; defect report in 2024

Sources