Oerlikon production abroad for the apartheid regime
Goods category: War materiel
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add South Africa to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for South Africa could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. The Netherlands could serve as a third country, having, according to SIPRI, supplied substantial quantities of war materiel to South Africa in recent years (90 million TIV).
Countries
Conflicts
Companies
Time period
Licensed production from 1964; contract in 1974; technical assistance into the 1980s; lawsuit announcement in 2002; Rheinmetall civil proceedings in 2009–2013
Sources
- Peter Hug, 2005: Mit der Apartheidregierung gegen den Kommunismus. Zusammenfassung der Studie im NFP 42+, insbesondere S. 4, 7–8, 10 und 12
- Der Bund, 28.10.2005, S. 2: Enge Bande zum Apartheidstaat; Schweizer Hilfe im Atombombenprogramm; Geschäft vor Menschenrechte (Stefan Schmid)
- Martin Stoll, Facts Nr. 28/2002: Von oben gebilligt, S. 21–25, insbesondere S. 24–25; Mitarbeit Stefan Barmettler
- Tages-Anzeiger, 13.11.2002, S. 2: Ed Fagan verklagt drei weitere Schweizer Firmen (Martina Egli)
- US District Court, Southern District of New York: In re South African Apartheid Litigation, 617 F. Supp. 2d 228, 08.04.2009 (Entscheid über Klageabweisungsanträge)
- US District Court, Southern District of New York: In re South African Apartheid Litigation, 02 MDL 1499, Dokument 282, 28.08.2014, S. 5 (Rheinmetall-Abweisung vom 26.12.2013)