Oerlikon guns for Afghan mujahideen
Goods category: War materiel
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add Afghanistan to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Afghanistan could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. The United States could serve as a third country, having, according to SIPRI, supplied substantial quantities of war materiel to Afghanistan in recent years (2’713 million TIV).
Countries
Conflicts
Companies
Time period
CIA procurement in 1985; documented on site in 1986
Sources
- NZZ, 13.06.1986
- nzz.ch, 17.03.2021: Die Schweizer Hightech-Kanone der afghanischen Islamisten (Ulrich Schmid, Berlin)
- Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 17.03.2021, S. 6: Die Schweizer Hightech-Waffe der Mujahedin (Ulrich Schmid, Berlin)