Patvag fuzes for Khomeini
Goods category: War materiel
Public Domain laut Commons (PD-1996)
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. For Sweden, as a current Annex 2 state, Article 22a paragraph 2bis would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. The Federal Council could add Iran to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Iran could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country.
Countries
Conflicts
Companies
Time period
Supplies in the 1980s; exposed in 1987; remaining delivery noted for September 1988
Sources
- Zürichbieter, 08.04.1988; Friedenspolitik Nr. 42, 1987
- Facts, 25.01.1996, S. 16 ff.: Blochers Geschäfte mit den Kriegsherren der Welt (Res Gehriger), einschliesslich der Stellungnahme des Ems-Konzerns
- Facts, 25.01.1996, S. 16–24: Ems-Patvag — Blochers Geschäfte mit den Kriegsherren der Welt (Res Gehriger)