Arms licences for Generalissimo Pinochet and subsequent transfers
Goods category: War materiel
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. For Croatia, as a current Annex 2 state, Article 22a paragraph 2bis would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. The Federal Council could add Chile, Iraq and Iran to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Chile, Iraq and Iran could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. For example, the following states could serve as third countries, having supplied substantial quantities of war materiel in recent years according to SIPRI: Chile: United States (468 million TIV); Iraq: United States (3’948 million TIV).
Countries
Conflicts
Companies
Time period
Licensing during the Pinochet dictatorship; onward transfers in the 1980s/1990s; use in 2019
Sources
- swissinfo.ch, 18.04.2023: Kriegsmaterialhandel: Die Schweizer Neutralität als Geschäftsmodell
- El Mercurio, 01.06.1986
- WoZ, 31.01.1992
- WOZ Rüstungsreport: General Dynamics European Land Systems – Mowag GmbH
- work, 01.11.2019: Chiles Präsident bodigt sein Volk mit Schweizer Hilfe