Swiss War Materiel and Arms Exports

Back to the list

Wild optical production for the apartheid armed forces

Goods category: Unclear

Racial segregation sign on Muizenberg beach, Cape Town, June 1985.

CC BY-SA 3.0

In 1974, Wild South Africa in Johannesburg began manufacturing optical equipment for the South African armed forces; its Swiss parent company was Wild Heerbrugg.

Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision

Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add South Africa to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for South Africa could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. The Netherlands could serve as a third country, having, according to SIPRI, supplied substantial quantities of war materiel to South Africa in recent years (90 million TIV).

Countries

Conflicts

Companies

Time period

Production began in 1974

Sources