Swiss War Materiel and Arms Exports

Back to the list

‘The world’s best hand grenades’ for the Gulf states

Goods category: War materiel (hand grenades; MAPAM mortar ammunition as a separate context)

Dutch Nr330C1 / RUAG HG85 hand grenade.

CC BY-SA 4.0

In February 2011, state-owned RUAG advertised ‘the world’s best hand grenades’ at the IDEX arms fair in Abu Dhabi, according to Blick. As uprisings spread across the Arab world, 38 Swiss companies presented their products in the authoritarian United Arab Emirates. Osec, the export promotion organisation funded by the Swiss Confederation, subsidised the ‘Swiss Pavilion’. Green Party president Ueli Leuenberger criticised the participation and announced parliamentary interventions. The slogan had already appeared in a 2003 Blick report on HG85 deliveries to Britain in the context of the Iraq War. In 2012, 20 Minuten identified the United Arab Emirates and Qatar as customers for Swiss HG85/OHG92 hand grenades and reported that grenades had reached Syrian rebels from the Emirates via Jordan; a subsequent route through Turkey was described as probable. These deliveries and finds are recorded in cases Q154 and Q180. The IDEX report does not specify a hand-grenade model or establish that a new sale was concluded. MAPAM refers to mortar ammunition and is distinct from HG85 hand grenades; the supplied articles do not establish a MAPAM delivery to Gulf states.

Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision

Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Qatar and the United Arab Emirates could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. For example, the following states could serve as third countries, having supplied substantial quantities of war materiel in recent years according to SIPRI: Qatar: United States (7’741 million TIV); United Arab Emirates: United States (9’818 million TIV).

Countries

Conflicts

Companies

Time period

Advertising in February 2011; supplementary reports from 2003 and 2012

Sources