Anti-aircraft guns despite armed conflict
Goods category: War materiel
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add Thailand to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Thailand could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. The United States could serve as a third country, having, according to SIPRI, supplied substantial quantities of war materiel to Thailand in recent years (476 million TIV).
Countries
Conflicts
Companies
Time period
2016–2017
Sources
- WOZ Rüstungsreport: Rheinmetall Air Defence AG
- SWI swissinfo, 26.09.2018: Werte und Waffen – die Schweiz liefert beides
- WOZ Die Wochenzeitung, 16.07.2020, S. 3: Waffenfabrik Schweiz; Tethys Systems: Umstrittene Rüstungsexporte nach Indien (Jan Jirát und Kaspar Surber; Illustration Marcel Bamert; Mitarbeit Lorenz Naegeli)
- Der Bund, 02.07.2018, S. 4: Feuer frei (David Hesse)
- Rheinmetall AG, 11.01.2016: Rheinmetall to supply Royal Thai Army with four air defence systems (unveränderte Unternehmensmitteilung bei MarketScreener/Publicnow)