Failed tank sale to Thailand
Goods category: War materiel
Public Domain (weltweite Freigabe durch Urheber)
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. The Federal Council could add Thailand to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Thailand could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. The United States could serve as a third country, having, according to SIPRI, supplied substantial quantities of war materiel to Thailand in recent years (476 million TIV).
Countries
Conflicts
Time period
Negotiations in 2002–2004; failure in 2005
Sources
- APA/Keystone-SDA / Der Standard, 01.03.2005: Schweiz – Panzergeschäft mit Thailand geplatzt
- Facts, 13.05.2004, S. 18: Nachschub aus der Schweiz; Neutral ist nicht genug (Andreas Schmid)