Weapon parts from Mugabe’s Zimbabwe via Montenegro
Goods category: War materiel
Effect of the proposed War Materiel Act revision
Under the new Article 22b, the Federal Council could depart from all the licensing criteria in Article 22a under vaguely defined ‘exceptional circumstances’. The public would not have to be informed. For the United States, as a current Annex 2 state, Article 22a paragraph 2bis would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. The Federal Council could add Montenegro to Annex 2 by amending the War Materiel Ordinance. This would remove the exclusion criterion based on participation in an armed conflict and make approval the rule. The Federal Council could refuse a licence only in exceptional cases. Article 18 paragraph 1 would abolish non-re-export declarations in the vast majority of cases. Weapons for Montenegro could thus easily be supplied through a subsidiary or intermediary in a third country. The United States could serve as a third country, having, according to SIPRI, supplied substantial quantities of war materiel to Montenegro in recent years (29 million TIV).
Countries
Companies
Time period
Transport on 04.02.2008; IPIS report in 2009; statement in 2020
Sources
- Brian Johnson-Thomas / Peter Danssaert, IPIS, Juli 2009: Zimbabwe – Arms and Corruption: Fuelling Human Rights Abuses, S. 4–5
- NZZ am Sonntag, 04.10.2020, S. 18: Krieg ist sein Geschäft (Boas Ruh)
- magazin.nzz.ch, 03.10.2020: Wie ein Berner Bauer zu einem der grössten Waffenhändler der Welt wurde (Boas Ruh)